DWDM & CWDM Channel Planner
Wavelength to frequency, the ITU grid in both directions, and a channel plan that catches the two ways assignments clash — including the one where the channel numbers look fine.
Convert
The grid
Channel assignments
Why the anchor is a frequency
Optical channels are defined by frequency because that is what the hardware controls. A laser is stabilised to a frequency; a filter passes a frequency band. Wavelength is a derived quantity, and the relationship between them is not linear — it is a reciprocal.
The practical consequence catches people out. On a 50 GHz grid, adjacent channels differ by 0.401 nm near 1550 nm and by 0.286 nm near 1310. Anyone who builds a channel list by repeatedly adding 0.4 nm will produce numbers that look right at one end of the band and are progressively wrong at the other.
So everything here starts at 193.1 THz and counts in whole spacings. Wavelengths are shown because that is what gets printed on a patch lead, but they are the output rather than the input.
Why CWDM is the other way round
CWDM channels are spaced in wavelength — 20 nm apart, from 1271 nm — and the reason is economic rather than physical.
A DWDM laser must be held to within a few gigahertz of its channel, which needs a thermoelectric cooler and a control loop. A CWDM channel is about a hundred times wider, so an uncooled laser whose wavelength wanders with ambient temperature stays comfortably inside it. That removes the cooler, the control electronics and much of the cost.
The trade is capacity: eighteen channels instead of ninety-six, and no optical amplification, because the channels are spread far outside the band an erbium amplifier covers.
The water peak
Four CWDM channels — roughly 1371 to 1431 nm — sit in a region where hydroxyl ions left over from manufacturing absorb strongly. On older fibre those channels can be several times more lossy than their neighbours, which makes them effectively unusable.
Low-water-peak fibre removes the problem, and most fibre installed this century is. But plenty of older cable is still in the ground, and a CWDM plan that assumes all eighteen channels are available on a route of unknown vintage is a plan that will need revisiting. The grid below flags them.
Two ways a plan clashes
Two services on one channel. The obvious case, and easy to catch by sorting a list.
Overlapping spectrum on different channel numbers. The subtle one. Put a 100 GHz carrier on channel 0 of a 50 GHz grid and it occupies the space channel 1 was meant to use — but the channel numbers are different, so a check that compares numbers passes it. Mixed line rates on one fibre make this ordinary rather than exotic, and the checker here compares actual occupied spectrum rather than labels.